<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/stylesheets/rss.css"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
  <channel>
    <title>Rails on PostgreSQL : Intro to PostGIS</title>
    <link>/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis?format=rss</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>&lt;h3&gt;If you like Ruby on Rails, you'll love Rails on PostgreSQL!&lt;/h3&gt;</description>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on Intro to PostGIS by Simon</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I think that you should rather use WGS84 (SRID = 4326) as it is widely used by the GPS system. And better: just check what WGS type you have in the incoming data.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Differences between those two you can find here:
&lt;a href="http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4269/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4269/&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 05:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:d2a8ef70-e0fc-426b-9296-6c5e0c778eb2</guid>
      <link>http://railsonpostgresql.com/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis#comment-16</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Comment on Intro to PostGIS by Doug Cole</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the pointer Simon, I&amp;#8217;ve updated the post.  We standardized on NAD83 as that was what most of the datasets we were using came in, but WGS84 looks like a slightly better option.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:uuid:30423f39-7e1f-450e-abf5-144c731c92c5</guid>
      <link>http://railsonpostgresql.com/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis#comment-17</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

