<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>tag:railsonpostgresql.com,2005:/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis</id>
  <link type="text/html" href="http://railsonpostgresql.com" rel="alternate"/>
  <link type="application/atom+xml" href="http://railsonpostgresql.com/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis.atom" rel="self"/>
  <title>Rails on PostgreSQL : Intro to PostGIS</title>
  <subtitle type="html">&lt;h3&gt;If you like Ruby on Rails, you'll love Rails on PostgreSQL!&lt;/h3&gt;</subtitle>
  <updated>2009-11-05T06:55:24+00:00</updated>
  <generator version="4.x" uri="http://www.typosphere.org">Typo</generator>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:railsonpostgresql.com,2005:Comment/16</id>
    <published>2009-11-05T05:21:42+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T06:55:24+00:00</updated>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://railsonpostgresql.com/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis#comment-16" rel="alternate"/>
    <author>
      <name>Simon</name>
    </author>
    <title type="html">Comment on Intro to PostGIS by Simon</title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>I think that you should rather use WGS84 (SRID = 4326) as it is widely used by the GPS system. And better: just check what WGS type you have in the incoming data.</p>

<p>Differences between those two you can find here:
<a href="http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4269/" rel="nofollow">http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4269/</a>
<a href="http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/" rel="nofollow">http://spatialreference.org/ref/epsg/4326/</a></p>        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>tag:railsonpostgresql.com,2005:Comment/17</id>
    <published>2009-11-05T18:28:46+00:00</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T18:35:14+00:00</updated>
    <link type="text/html" href="http://railsonpostgresql.com/2009/11/05/intro-to-postgis#comment-17" rel="alternate"/>
    <author>
      <name>Doug Cole</name>
    </author>
    <title type="html">Comment on Intro to PostGIS by Doug Cole</title>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Thanks for the pointer Simon, I&#8217;ve updated the post.  We standardized on NAD83 as that was what most of the datasets we were using came in, but WGS84 looks like a slightly better option.</p>        </div>
      </div>
    </content>
  </entry>
</feed>

